Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Y-TZP zirconiaÀÇ ±â°èÀû Ç¥¸é󸮰¡ ÆÄÀýÀúÇ×°ú Á¢Âø°è¸é ½ÇÆп¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

Effect of mechanical surface treatment on the fracture resistance and interfacial bonding failure of Y-TZP zirconia

±¸°­È¸º¹ÀÀ¿ë°úÇÐÁö 2014³â 30±Ç 2È£ p.102 ~ 111
À̾çÁø,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À̾çÁø ( Lee Yang-Jin ) - ºÐ´ç¼­¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶°ú

Abstract

¸ñÀû: º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº air-blasting particle size¸¦ ´Þ¸®ÇÏ°í ºÐ»ç ¾Ð·Â°ú ½Ã°£À» Åë»óº¸´Ù Å©°Ô Áõ°¡½ÃÄÑ Ç¥¸é¿¡ Å« ¼Õ
»óÀ» À¯¹ßÇÑ ±ºÀ» »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÛÀº ¼Õ»óÀ» À¯¹ßÇÑ ±º°ú ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© ÆÄÀý ÀúÇ×°ú Á¢Âø °­µµ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌ´ÂÁö Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â µ¥
ÀÖ´Ù.

¿¬±¸ Àç·á ¹× ¹æ¹ý: Áö¸£ÄڴϾÆ(LAVATM) µð½ºÅ© Ç¥¸é¿¡ °¢°¢ 30 ¥ìm- particle size (Cojet) 2.8 bar 15ÃÊ, 110 ¥ìm- (Rocatec)
2.8 bar 15ÃÊ, 110 ¥ìm- (Rocatec) 3.8 bar 30ÃÊ·Î Á¶°ÇÀ» ´Þ¸®ÇÏ¿© Ç¥¸éó¸® ÈÄ °¢°¢ ÀÌÃà ±ÁÈûÇÏÁß °­µµ ½ÇÇè°ú
Á¢Âø ÆÄÀý ÇÏÁß ½ÇÇèÀ» ½ÇÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á¢ÂøÀº »ó¾ÆÁú À¯»ç º£À̽º¿¡ 200 ¥ìm µÎ²²ÀÇ ·¹Áø½Ã¸àÆ®·Î ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿© ÀÎÀå·ÂÀ» ±Ø
´ëÈ­ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç À½Çâ¹æÃâ(AE) ¼¾¼­·Î ½ÇÆÐÇÏÁßÀ» °ËÃâÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: ÀÌÃà ±ÁÈûÇÏÁß °­µµ, Á¢Âø ÆÄÀýÇÏÁßÀº ¼¼ ±º°£ ¼­·Î À¯ÀǼº ÀÖ´Â Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù(P > 0.05). Á¢Âø ½ÃÆíÀÇ ±Õ
¿­Àº ´ëºÎºÐ radial crackÀ̾ú´Ù.

°á·Ð: Á¤ÇÏÁß Æò°¡ÀÇ ÇÑ°è ³»¿¡¼­, air-blasting particle size¿Í ¾Ð·Â¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Ç¥¸é ¼Õ»óÀº Å©Áö ¾Ê¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, Á¢Âø ÆÄÀýÇÏÁß
Æò°¡´Â Ç¥¸é ¼Õ»ó°ú Á¢Âø °­µµ¸¦ µ¿½Ã¿¡ Æò°¡ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀÌ¶ó ¿©°ÜÁø´Ù.

Purpose: Surface damage and bonding strength difference after micromechanical treatment of zirconia surface are to be studied yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference of fracture resistance and bonding strength between more surfacedamaged group from higher air-blasting particle size and pressure, and less damaged group.

Materials and Methods: Disk shape zirconia (LAVATM) was sintered and air-blasted with 30 ¥ìm particle size (Cojet), under 2.8 bar for 15 seconds, 110 ¥ìm particle size (Rocatec), under 2.8 bar for 15 seconds, and 110 ¥ìm particle size (Rocatec), under 3.8 bar for 30 seconds respectively. Biaxial flexure test and bonding failure load test were performed serially (n = 10 per group). For bonding test, specimens were bonded on the base material having similar modulus of elasticity of dentin with 200 ¥ìm-thick resin cement for tension of surface damage. Failure load of bonding was detected with acoustic emission (AE) sensor.

Results: There were no significant differences both in the biaxial flexure test and bonding failure load test between groups (P > 0.05). Sub-surface cracks were all radial cracks except for two specimens.

Conclusion: Within the limitations of no aging under monotonic load test, surface damage from higher air-blasting particle size and pressure was not significant. Evaluations of failure load with bonded zirconia disks was clinically relevant modality for surface damage and bonding strength, simultaneously.

Å°¿öµå

°­µµ;À½Çâ¹æÃâ;ÀÌÃà ±ÁÈû;Á¢Âø;Áö¸£ÄڴϾÆ;¿¡¾îºí¶ó½ºÆÃ
acoustic emission;air abrasion;biaxial flexure;bonding;strength;zirconia

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI